spacer
Intranet SITEMAP Contacts Events North Carolina Central University
spacer
Spacer About NCCU Academics Admissions Clinical Programs Institute Student Services / Career Services Facilities Library Alumni / Giving Technology
 
 
Sapcer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  * Adobe Acrobat Reader
   is Required
- Download
  Law Review - Archive
  Home > Student Life > Student Organizations > Law Review
   
 
   
   
  For issue orders or article inquiries click here. .
 
Voting Rights Rollback: The Effect Of Buckhannon On The Private Enforcement of Voting Rights
Brian J. Sutherland
 
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 This article contextualizes the crisis created by Buckhannon with reference to voting rights specifically.  Part II briefly summarizes the background on attorney’s fees and the sea of change that Buckhannon brought about.  Part III then builds on the other valuable commentary to explain how voting rights cases, like other kinds of public interest litigation are by their nature uniquely susceptible to Buckhannon.  Next, Part IV illustrates these features by reference to some of the extant case law in order to concretely identify the obstacles to voting rights enforcement created by Buckhannon.  Finally, Part V offers additional remarks on how Buckhannon poses a threat to voting rights and urges a congressional solution in order to avoid evisceration of fundamental protections of the Voting Rights Act and other civil rights laws.
Year 2008
Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 267
# Pages 23
Start Page 267
   
     
The Early Roberts Court Attacks Congress's Power To Protect Civil Rights
Rochelle Bobroff
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 While the decisions of the early Roberts Court are couched in legalistic, technical language, the impact of these cases are simple: The Court has threatened the power of Congress to protect civil rights.  The conservative bloc has rejected legislative intent, in some cases explicitly choosing not to follow clear expressions of congressional will and in other cases totally ignoring the question of congressional will and in other cases totally ignoring the question of congressional intent.  Laws that overrule the decisions of the Rehnquist Court have been narrowly construed by the majority, and numerous precedents that uphold civil rights have been limited to their facts or rejected outright.  The early Roberts Court has abdicated its role to ensure that administrative interpretations of statutes comport with congressional intent, deferring heavily to executive branch litigation positions that contradict statutory goals.  The Court has belittled the expertise of judges and juries to decide complex issues of law and fact, and a majority has explicitly overruled cases that support the equitable power of the judiciary.  The conservative Justices have signaled that they will continue the Rehnquist Court’s refusal to permit Congress to hold states accountable for violating civil rights.  Usurping the Constitutional power of Congress, the early Roberts Court has pursued a political agenda of eradicating the protections of individual rights in civil rights statutes.
Year 2008
 Citation  30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 231
 # Pages  36
 Start Page  231
   
 
Why We Can't Wait:  Reversing The Retreat on Civil Rights: An Introduction to the Civil Rights Section
Joshua Cristobal Alex, Carey Alexander, Tanene Allison, Genevieve Gazon, Marianne Engleman Lado
 
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 In the first article, Brian Sutherland examines the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. W.V. Dep’t Health & Human Res., a fairly technical decision that restricted the award of statutory attorney’s fees, and focuses on the very practical barriers it creates to the enforcement of voting rights. In the second article, Rochelle Bobroff reviews the rollback of civil rights during the years of the Rehnquist Court and then outlines how the first two terms of the Roberts Court provide ample reason for concern that remaining civil rights protections are at even greater risk.  Although the decisions of the early Roberts Court have been couched in legalistic, technical language, rather than broad sweeping pronouncements, the import of these opinions is clear:  The Court is posed to restrict the power of Congress to protect civil rights.
Year 2008
Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 224
# Pages 7
Start Page 224
   
 
Environmental Justice for All? The Navy's Recent Failure to Protect North Carolina's Citizens
William Eubanks II
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 This article will first focus on the Navy’s OLF by providing relevant background information and by analyzing the judicial opinion of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to determine whether the Navy acted within the bounds of the law.  Next, this article will examine the subjective intent of the Navy in reaching its decision in the OLF selection process and will highlight the Navy’s failure to fairly conduct the process, which creates a serious environment justice concern.  The article will then discuss background information on the USWTR and will review the Navy’s failures to date in the USWTR project.  Finally, the article will conclude by emphasizing the lessons of the OLF process in order to protect North Carolina’s citizens from similar abuses by the United States Navy in the USWTR project and in future projects may be undertaken. 
Year 2008
 Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 206
 # Pages 18
 Start Page  206
   
 
Allowing For Greater Leniency in the Appellate Process: How State v. Hart Both Clarified and Expanded Rule 2 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure Following The Supreme Court’s Decision in Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
Robert Jordan McCarter
 
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 This note will initially focus on Justice Hudson’s opinion in Hart along with an analysis of that opinion so that future cases may be decided in the same manner.  Furthermore, the note will examine the background surrounding Rule 2 with a special emphasis on its application prior to and then after the Viar holding. It is necessary to understand the prior case law on this matter when reviewing Hart, so the proverbial dots may be connected.  In conclusion, the note will consider the possible ramifications of using the Hart analysis in the future, along with suggestions for improvement in the area.
Year 2008
Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 189
# Pages 17
Start Page 189
   
 
The Paving Principle of Good Intentions? Calls for Reform of The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and The Private Game Theory Equilibrium Opposing Them
John C. Kuzenski
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 In this essay, I seek to review some of the more interesting works in the area from recent years, the relevant provisions of IGRA, and some of the paramount cases that have shaped the contemporary Indian gaming debate.  After reviewing these materials, I suggest that they miss the more practical mark of finding an empirically (and legally) satisfying basis from which the two principals in the current debate, Indian tribes and the states can work cooperatively to maximize their own interest.  Ironically, this basis is not grounded in dramatic reformation of the IGRA.  It is instead grounded borrowing a few basic principles form classic game theory in the idea that IGRA remains an appropriate and workable legislative response to the tribal-state conflict over the utility of Indian gaming operations. Courts may be required to continue to proved minor and incremental clarifications to keep the balance between the major players, but the legislation has otherwise “shaken itself out” into pragmatic framework for the future.  In short, there have been far too many calls in the recent literature with specifics for how we should change IGRA.  My argument is that the more compelling issue, which has not yet been adequately addressed, is why we should change it at all.
Year 2008
 Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 168
 # Pages 21
 Start Page 168
   
 
Memo To Lawyers: How Not To "Retire And Teach"
Jeffrey M. Lipshaw
 
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 This note will initially focus on Justice Hudson’s opinion in Hart along with an analysis of that opinion so that future cases may be decided in the same manner.  Furthermore, the note will examine the background surrounding Rule 2 with a special emphasis on its application prior to and then after the Viar holding. It is necessary to understand the prior case law on this matter when reviewing Hart, so the proverbial dots may be connected.  In conclusion, the note will consider the possible ramifications of using the Hart analysis in the future, along with suggestions for improvement in the area.
Year 2008
Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 151
# Pages 17
Start Page 151
   
     
Strategies For Dealing With Self-Represented Litigants
Jona Goldschmidt
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 The numbers of self-represented litigants (SRLs) has been rising steadily since the late 1990s, both in the U.S. and in the Commonwealth countries.  Although courts have implemented policies, programs, and organizational changes to handle the growing number of SRLs, little guidance has been given to attorneys to prepare them for their inevitable interaction with this new kind of adversary.  Part I discusses ethical issues such as communication with the SRLs, ghostwriting of pleadings and other court papers for SRLs, and judicial ethics.  Part II examines pretrial strategies for dealing with SRLs.  Part III discusses filing motions when faced with a SRL.  Part IV discusses possible procedures for handling discovery.  Part V examines how to use trial strategies without coming on too strong.  Part VI explains bringing rule noncompliance to the court’s attention.  Part VII concludes the article.
Year 2008
 Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 130
 # Pages 21
 Start Page 130
   
 
Ring v. Arizona and Capital Proceedings: Brave New World Or A Reversion To the Old World?
Bruce T. Cunningham, Heather L. Ratelade, Amanda Zimmer
 
Synopsis
Volume 30-2 This article begins with a summary of the two primary animating principles of the Court’s capital jurisprudence: the Eighth Amendment requirements that a jury’s discretion to find a defendant guilty of a death qualifying crime be guided and the jury be able to consider characteristics of the defendant before selecting death as the appropriate punishment.  A brief summary of Apprendi follows.  Next, the authors discuss Ring v. Arizona and Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania.  Ring extends the Apprendi Rule to capital litigation and Justice Scalia’s opinion in Sattazahn sets forth the basic proposition that First Degree Murder is a crime separate from a lesser than Aggravated First Degree Murder.  The article concludes with the prediction of inevitable revolutionary change in the trials of capital cases in North Carolina.
Year 2008
Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 107
# Pages 23
Start Page 107
   
 
Persecution Based on Persecution: How Gao v. Gonzales Broadens The Interpretation of Asylum Law
David Baxter
Synopsis
Volume 30-1 This note first presents the facts of the case at hand and the judicial decisions made. The note then examines the state of asylum law as determined by statute and precedent  Finally, the note points out the differences that exist between the test the court adopted and the way it was applied.
Year 2007
 Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 97
 # Pages 9
 Start Page 97
   
 
 
North Carolina v. Bryant: Paving The Way For A Comprehensive National Sex Offender Registry
Karen S. Schuller
 
Synopsis
Volume 30-1 This article analyzes the issue of state sex offender registires in a national context, a situtaion rife with disparities and contradictions prior to them implementation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) included in the Adam Walsh Chid Protection and Safety Act of 2006.  This article reviews the historical background of the federal legislation initiating and regulating sex offender registries along with the specific state statutes at issue in Bryant. It also reviews the issue of notice required by the federal Due Process Clause by examining the U.S. Supreme Court's treatment of the required notice for a convicted felon's specific duty to register as a felon.  Additionally, this article examines how other state courts have answered the same question presented in the Bryant case.  The article then discusses: (1) the unique facts of the Bryant case, involving a convicted sex offender moving form one state to another, and the requirements of giving such an offender notice of the duty to register as a sex offender in the new state; (2) how the North Carolina Supreme Court reached its decision; and (3) how the decision may have been altered by varying circumstances.  Finally, this article examines the newly enacted SORNA and the National Guidelines for Sex Offender Registration and Notification Proposed by the U.S. Attorney General for implementation of the aforemention Act.
Year 2007
Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 76
# Pages 22
Start Page 76
   
 
Embracing The Living Constitution: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's Move Away From A Conservative Methodology of Constitutional Interpretation
Joshua Cristobal Alex, Carey Alexander, Tanene Allison, Genevieve Gazon, Marianne Engleman Lado
Synopsis
Volume 30-1 This paper argues that it is Kennedy's divergent methodological approach to constitutional interpretation that separates him from his conservative colleagues on these key issues.  In sharp contradistinction to the originalism interpretive methodologies of Justice Antonin Scalia, Kennedy appears to have embraced the concept of a "Living Constitution".  Part I briefly reviews the debate over the notion of a "Living Constitution," its incompatibility with interpretivist methodologies, the modern Court's renewed debate over concept, and the rejection of the living constitutionalism. by Justice Scalia.  Part II examines the contrasting compatibility of this notion with Justice Kennedy's approach to constitutional interpretation,  The examination of his decision-making, particularly on the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence reveals that Kennedy's methodology has increasingly differed from that of his conservative collegues in his: (1) refusal to take a narrow and cabined view of text and tradition;  (2) willingness to view history and tradition as ongoing and evolving;  (3) willingenss to address constitutional rights in question at a high level of generalization; (4) receptivity toward international trends and opinion; and (5) broad conception of the judicial role and emphasis on judicial independence.  While Part III considers some of the limitations to proclaiming Kennedy an adherent, the evolutions in Kennedy's jurisprudence suggest that he is increasingly receptive to the notion of the "Living Constitution" - an approach to constitutional interpretation which views the Constitution's meaning as dynamic and evolving and which rejects strict adherence to text and historical tradition.  This schism between Kennedy's flexible constitutionalism and his colleague's text-based originalism will have significant consequences for coalition building within the Court as the methodological distinctions between Kennedy and Scalia's interpretive approaches becomes more pronounced.
Year 2007
 Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 25
 # Pages 50
 Start Page 25
   
 
Apprendi/Blakely: A Primer For Practitioners
Bruce Cunningham, Heather Ratelade, Amanda Zimmer
 
Synopsis
Volume 30-1 The purpose of this article is to explore some of these complex Apprendi/Blakely issues in a manner which is useful for the courtroom practitioner.  The implications of Apprendi/Blakely are largely uncharted territory and some of the opinions expressed in this article have not been addressed by any appellate court.  In some instances, there are North Carolina appellate decisions which the authors contend are inconsistent with the basic premise of the Sixth Amendment line of cases.  The article is intended to broaden the view of Apprendi/Blakely to include concepts that extend far beyond sentencing.  The article is divided into three parts and is geared toward the trial, appellate, and post-convictions lawyer.  Part I is devoted to a discussion of the historical context of Apprendi/Blakely and the basic conceptual underpinnings of the Supreme Court's Sixth Amendment line of cases.  Part II presents of framework for analyzing Apprendi/Blakely issues arising under SSA.  Part III, appearing in a later volume of the North Carolina Central Univeristy Law Review, will deal exclusivelyw ith capital litigation and the Sixth Amendment line.
Year 2007
Citation 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 1
# Pages 24
Start Page 1
   
 
Barrett v. Rosenthal: Oh, What A Tangled Web We Weave - No Liability For Web Defamation
Ternisha Miles
Synopsis
Volume 29-2 This note examines Barrett v. Rosenthal and how it is significant in nationwide courts because it is the first case to state that the publisher/distributor analysis normally attributable to secondary publishers does not apply to an Internet user.  It also established for the first time that private individuals can be protected under the CDA.  The Barrett decision has completely alleviated liability for defamation against Internet users and has left injured plaintiffs with no means of recovery.
Year 2007
 Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J.  267
 # Pages 11
 Start Page 267
   
 
Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna: The Latest Example Of How The Supreme Court Has Turned The Federal Arbitration Act Into A State Defying Monstrosity
Brian Groesser
 
Synopsis
Volume 29-2 This note will first discuss the facts surrounding Buckeye.  It will then explore the history that led to the Buckeye decision.  The history will begin with the establishment of the United States Arbitration Act (now known as the Federal Arbitration Act) and a discussion of its purpose and intent.  This note will then focus on the lineage of case law that Buckeye arises from, starting with Prima Paint.  Justices have continuously disagreed on the scope of the FAA, starting with a lengthy dissent from Justice Black in Prima Paint.  This note will discuss both sides to landmark cases in the lineage such as Prima Paint and Southland Corp. v. Keating.  Finally, this note will analyze Buckeye in the context of its role in expanding federal power and how that expansion is inappropriate.
Year 2007
Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J.  250
# Pages 17
Start Page 250
   
 
A Good Fix But Not The Cure - Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization And Amendments Act Of 2006
David H. Harris, Jr. and Trish Hardy
Synopsis
Volume 29-2 After providing some background information on Section 5 and the reauthorization process, this article will discuss the problems created by the Supreme Court decisions in Bossier Parish II and Ashcroft.  Thereafter, this article will discuss the Section 5 clarification provisions in H.R. 9 intended to eliminate the negative impact of Bossier Parish II and Ashcroft.  Finally, this article will discuss whether these “clarifications” will hold and how the reauthorization process and clarification might impact renewed litigation to invalidate Section 5.  This article will not discuss the improvements in protections for language minorities and federal observers, which are very significant.
Year 2007
 Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J.  224
 # Pages 26
 Start Page 224
   
 
The Dream Of Greater Municipal Autonomy: Should The Legislature Or The Courts Modify Dillon's Rule, A Common Law Restraint On Municipal Powers?
Louis v. Csoka
 
Synopsis
Volume 29-2 The purpose of this article is to take a critical look at Dillon’s Rule and to examine the background and implications of the debate on municipal power.  Specifically, this article will examine and analyze the historical background, legal framework, and policy rationale for that policy debate and attempt to provide some recommendations to help address the obstacles and challenges associated with Dillon’s Rule.  In particular, Part II of this article will briefly review the evolutions of municipal governance from the days of the Roman Empire to early Colonial America.  Part III will study the circumstances surrounding the birth of Dillon’s Rule in nineteenth century America.  Part IV will analyze the inner workings of Dillon’s Rule and its most extreme applications.  Part V will provide a case study on the municipal landscape in Nevada.  Part VI will analyze Nevada case law under Dillon’s Rule.  Parts VII and VIII will analyze the national arguments for and against Dillon’s rule.  Part IX will look at some of the practical effects of Dillon’s Rule and its competing model of local governance.  Lastly, Part X will attempt to provide a pragmatic synthesis of the various countervailing policy arguments as a basis for updating current framework in Nevada and elsewhere.
Year 2007
Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J.  194
# Pages 30
Start Page 194
   
 
Outlawed and Exiled: Zero Tolerance And Second Generation Race Discrimination In Public Schools
Frances P. Solari and Julienne E. M. Balshaw
Synopsis
Volume 29-2 This article seeks to assist practitioners in identifying claims of second-generation discrimination against local school systems based on racially disparate enforcement of zero tolerance policies.  It first sets out potential federal and state constitutional claims based on violations of equal protection, procedural due process, and vagueness.  It concludes by identifying several defenses school systems commonly offer to escape accountability for perpetuating second generation segregation and depriving children of color of their constitutionally guaranteed equal access to a basic public education.
Year 2007
 Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J.  147
 # Pages 47
 Start Page 147
   
 
Where Sexual Privacy Meets Public Morality: How Williams v. King Is Instructive For The Fourth Circuit In Applying Public Morality As A Legitimate State Interest After Lawrence v. Texas
Douglas E. Nauman
 
Synopsis
Volume 29-1 This note first analyzes the case of Williams v. Kings (Williams V) and its predecessors. Second, then note focuses on the historical development of the constitutional right of privacy, particularly as it relates to personal sexual conduct.  Third, the note examines the holding of Lawrence v. Texas.  Lastly, with that background, this note analyzes the potential significance of Williams v. King (Williams V) for courts applying morality as a legitimate state interest after Lawrence v. Texas.
Year 2006
Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 127
# Pages 19
Start Page 127
   
 
Oppression Through Violence: The Case of Colombia - An Expansion Of The Fetish Object?
J. Corey Harris
Synopsis
Volume 29-1 This article will be organized into four parts: Part I discusses the culture of violence in Colombia.  Part II reviews the three major guerilla factions in Colombia and their organizational goals and structure.  Part III addresses the U.S. and Colombian responses to the violence.  Part IV explains the U.S. military and policy approach from a Critical Race Theory perspective.
Year 2006
 Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J. 98
 # Pages 29
 Start Page 98
   
 
Bargain Basement Annexation: How much Municipalities Subvert The Intent of North Carolina Annexation Laws
Elizabeth R. Connolly
 
Synopsis
Volume 29-1 This article will utilize the experiences of the communities in southern Moore county to highlight the inherent flaws in North Carolina’s annexation statute.  First, this article sets out the history of North Carolina’s annexation policies and how those policies have been implemented.  Second, this article examines the experiences of unincorporated communities in southern Moore County that desperately sought (and were denied) annexation and its corresponding municipal services.  Finally, this article briefly analyzes ways in which North Carolina’s statutory scheme can be improved to allow for equitable urban development.
Year 2006
Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 77
# Pages 21
Start Page 77
   
 
DaimlerChrylser v. Cuno - Plaintiffs Lack Standing To Challenge State Franchise Tax Credit In Federal Court, According to the Supreme Court
Sue Ann Mota
Synopsis
Volume 29-1 This article will examine the issue of standing in federal court by taxpayers challenging governmental actions.  The article will then address the DaimlerChrylser Corp. v. Cuno case and will conclude with thoughs on changing or challenging these state tax incentives to companies.
Year 2006
 Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J. 66
 # Pages 11
 Start Page 66
   
 
Providing Material Support To Violate The Constitution: The USA Patriot Act and Its Assault On the 4th Amendment
Christopher Metzler
 
Synopsis
Volume 29-1 The first section will be a review of the Fourth Amendment.  It will follow the trajectory of searches and seizures from Seventeenth Century England to post September 11th Fourth Amendment applications.  This article will then turn to a review of the Patriot Act.  It will first consider the governmental interest in creating the Patriot Act, as well as previous examples in American history, in which drastic measures were taken in response to perceived threats.  The next section will discuss the inherent difficulties with some of the sections of the Patriot Act.  Then, a Fourth Amendment analysis will be applied to the problematic sections of the Patriot Act.  Next, the article will prove predictions as to the long-term effects of leaving the Patriot Act intact.  Finally, suggestions for correcting the problems created by the Patriot Act are discussed.
Year 2006
Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 35
# Pages 31
Start Page 35
   
 
Racial Justice and Equity for African-American Males In the American Educational System: A Dream Forever Deferred
Floyd D. Weatherspoon
Synopsis
Volume 29-1 This article will explore how the failure of Brown to ensure quality and meaningful education for African-American male students is the major impetus for racial injustice and inequity that African-American male students endure.  Part II of this article describes the initial impact that the Brown decision had on ending the segregation of public schools.  Part III reveals how public schools have returned to segregated insutitutions.  Part IV explains how the Brown decision has failed to ensure equity and quality education for African-American males.  This section will also document the present deteriorating statutes of African-American males in public schools.  Lastly, Part V, the conclusion, provides a brief discussion on remedies to enhance the status of African-American males in public educational systems.
Year 2006
 Citation 29 N.C. Cent. L.J. 1
 # Pages 34
 Start Page 1
   
 
 
Clean Air, Clean Conscience: Evaluating The Early Action Compact Program Under The Shadow Of The Clean Air Act In The Five-Year Wake Of Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc.
Amanda L. Maris
 
Synopsis
Volume 28-2 This article will be divided into six parts.  Part I will offer background on the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) program under the Clean Air Act as it applies to attainment of the ozone criteria pollutant and nonattainment status.  Part II will describe the relevant portions of Whitman and the implementation rules issued by the EPA in April, 2004 and November, 2005.  Part III will explain the EAC program. Part IV will include an application of both compliance schemes to two nonattainment areas in North Carolina.  Part V, will be the analysis, and Par VI, the conclusion of the article.
Year 2006
Citation 28 N.C. Cent. L.J.  260
# Pages 24
Start Page 260
   
 
Nickel and Dimed: North Carolina Court Blocks Carolina Panthers' Attempt To Avoid Payment Of Workers' Compensation Benefits To Injured Athletes
Casey N. Harding
Synopsis
Volume 28-2 This comment examines the reasonableness of the court’s decisions in three of the four Carolina Panthers workers’ compensation cases by first taking the reader through a summary of each case.  The comment next focuses on the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement, the Standard Players’ Contract, and injuries in the NFL.  Next, the comment examines workers’ compensation laws of other states.  Finally, the comment discusses the problems with awarding workers compensation benefits to professional athletes and offers solutions for these problems.
Year 2006
 Citation 28 N.C. Cent. L.J. 241
 # Pages 19
 Start Page 241
   
 
 
Another Road To Liability Is Paived With Good Intentions: Observations On The Supreme Court's Latest Word On the Disparate Impact Theory Of Discrimination
Matthew J. Gilley and Atwoine L. Edwards
 
Synopsis
Volume 28-2 This essay will argue that the Supreme Court applied the disparate impact theory in the ADEA context with less justification than when it applied it in the Title VII context.  Moreover, Smith’s fragmented holding will confuse rather than resolve prevailing interpretations of the ADEA, and the availability of disparate impact age claims will have a definite and uncertain impact on employers and employees during reductions in force.  Overall, Smith highlights several Justices’ hauntingly naïve interpretation of employment statutes in a way that is unnecessarily destructive of management prerogatives and will result in a proliferation of disparate impact claims in connection with reductions in force.  This proliferation of disparate impact claims will have a chilling effect on management prerogatives during reductions in force, and will be detrimental to both management and labor.
Year 2006
Citation 28 N.C. Cent. L.J.  228
# Pages 13
Start Page 228
   
 
North Carolina's Real Estate Recording Laws: The Ghost of 1885
Charles Szypszak
Synopsis
Volume 28-2 This article discusses the nature of the race recording statute and the major conceptual and practical issues that have arisen in its application.  Part II discusses the statute and the extent to which it truly results in a pure record as originally envisioned.  It also considers how the statute could be amended to reflect the law as it is actually applied.  Part III describes undue risks to legitimate conveyances posed by requiring strict compliance with recording rules and examines possible refinements to the laws to address these risks.  Part IV describes abuse of the recording system and possible legislative responses to the problem.
Year 2006
 Citation 28 N.C. Cent. L.J. 199
 # Pages 29
 Start Page 199
   
 
Georgia Photo ID Requirement: Proof Positive of The Need To Extend Section 5
David H. Harris, Jr.
 
Synopsis
Volume 28-2 After giving a brief overview of the procedural history of the Common Cause/Georgia litigation in Part II, this article will examine several provisions of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”) in Part III.  This article will then explore the Georgia statute in Part IV, analyze the reasoning of the district court injunction in Part V, and conclude in Part VII with a discussion of the Department of Justice’s failure to exercise its power under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act against obviously discriminatory impediment to voting and the necessity of continuing and strengthening Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to make it unnecessary for litigants to expend tremendous resources litigating these types of cases.  Although the State of Indiana is the only other state to impose a similar photo identification requirement for in person voting, this article will not discuss that law.  Nevertheless, it is worth noting that while Indiana is not covered under Section 5 of the VRA, and the statute is currently being challenged in litigation, which has been unsuccessful to date.  This article will also not discuss the 2006 Georgia Photo ID statute, as it would be premature to do so and discussion is unnecessary to make the basic points throughout this article.
Year 2006
Citation 28 N.C. Cent. L.J.  172
# Pages 27
Start Page 172
   
 
The Prospect Of Enacting An Unborn Victims of Violence Act In North Carolina
Jennifer A. Brobst
Synopsis
Volume 28-2 This article discusses how North Carolina is particularly ripe for judicial and legislative attention to fetal rights in the criminal justice system.  Part II discusses the historical development of fetal rights, including the national trend to enact fetal homicide laws, civil suits by and on the behalf of the fetus, child endangerment actions for risk to the fetus, and the limited scope of fetal rights in abortion law.  Part III discusses justifying abortion in the child rights era, human population control, the undue burden of an unwanted pregnancy, and the risk of injury, death, or severe disability.  Part IV examines the considerations for an unborn victims of violence act in North Carolina.
Year 2006
 Citation 28 N.C. Cent. L.J. 127
 # Pages 45
 Start Page 127
   
 

 

 
<< [1] [2] [3] [4] >>
 
 
NCCU School of Law • 640 Nelson Street • Durham, North Carolina 27707 • (919) 530-6333
Copyright © 2007 North Carolina Central University